Ultraintensive livestock farming
an integrative review of technical, financial, environmental, and social-institutional indicators in Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18004/investig.agrar.2025.2702868Keywords:
ultraintensive livestock farming, integrative review, sustainability, strategic supplementation, financial viabilityAbstract
Bovine livestock farming in Latin America faces the challenge of increasing productivity and competitiveness without worsening environmental impacts or conflicts over land use. In this context, ultraintensive systems with strategic supplementation emerge as an alternative; however, regional evidence remains scattered, heterogeneous, and based on metrics that are not always comparable, which limits evidence-based technical and policy decisions. This article comparatively evaluates the technical, financial, environmental, and social-institutional viability of ultraintensive livestock systems with strategic supplementation against traditional extensive models in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, and Colombia. An integrative review was conducted following the methodology proposed by Whittemore and Knafl (2005) and PRISMA 2020. Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and Redalyc were consulted, supplemented by grey literature (FAO, IICA, CEPAL, INAC, INTA, EMBRAPA). A total of 240 records were identified, and 50 documents were included (32 articles, 10 technical reports, 5 theses, and 3 reviews) published between 2000 and 2024 in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. The synthesis indicates that ultraintensive models increase weight gain (20–35%), improve forage efficiency (up to 40%), and reduce GHG emissions per kg of meat (15–25%). Financially, they show better medium-term returns, although the initial investment and access to credit restrict adoption among smallholder producers. At the social-institutional level, training, cultural acceptance, and traceability and certification frameworks condition scaling. Overall, the findings support policies and investments aimed at sustainable intensification, with financing, technical assistance, and territorial governance.Downloads
Metrics
References
Andeweg, K., & Reisinger, A. (2014). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from livestock: Best practice and emerging options. World Bank. https://saiplatform.org/uploads/Modules/Library/lrg-sai-livestock-mitigation_web2.pdf
Aquilani, C., Confessore, A., Bozzi, R., Sirtori, F., & Pugliese, C. (2022). Review: Precision Livestock Farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems. Animal, 16(1), 100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100429
Asociación Rural del Paraguay (ARP). (2025). Boletín semanal informativo N.º 590. https://www.arp.org.py/images/ima2022/Boletn_Semanal_Informativo_Nro_590.pdf
Berckmans, D. (2017). General introduction to precision livestock farming. Animal Frontiers, 7(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0102
Bungenstab, D. J. (Ed.). (2012). Sistemas de integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta: a produção sustentável. Portal EMBRAPA. https://www.embrapa.br/en/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/938814/sistemas-de-integracao-lavoura-pecuaria-floresta-a-producao-sustentavel
Rodríguez, A. G., Mondaini, A. O. y Hitschfeld, M. A. (2019). La bioeconomía en América Latina y el Caribe: Contexto global y regional, perspectivas. CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/42427-bioeconomia-america-latina-caribe-contexto-global-regional-perspectivas
Cortiana Tambara, A. A. C., Härter, C. J., Silveira Rabelo, C. H. S., & Kozloski, G. V. (2021). Effects of supplementation on production of beef cattle grazing tropical pastures in Brazil during the wet and dry seasons: a meta-analysis. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 50, e20210020. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbz/a/yxwJ5FkXjcybp9Yg9S3c8KH/?format=html&lang=en
Da Silva, S. C., & Carvalho, P. C. F. (2005). Foraging behaviour and herbage intake in the favourable tropics/sub-tropics. In Editor: D. A. McGilloway. Grassland: a global resource: Wageningen Academic, BRILL, pp. 81-95. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4892&context=igc
Dumont, B., Groot, J. C. J. & Tichit, M. (2018). Review: Make ruminants green again – how can sustainable intensification and agroecology converge for a better future? Animal, 12(S2), s210-s219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001350
Lopes de S. Thiago, L. R. & Marques da Silva, J. (2001). Suplementação de bovinos em pastejo. Brasilia: EMBRAPA. https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/bitstream/doc/325191/1/DOC108.pdf
Euclides, V. P. B., Montagner, D. B., Barbosa, R. A., y Nantes, N. N. (2014). Manejo do pastejo de cultivares de Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst) Stapf e de Panicum maximum Jacq. Revista Ceres, 61(supl.), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737X201461000006
FAO. (2018). World livestock: Transforming the livestock sector through the Sustainable Development Goals. Rome: FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3e7ba7ed-1eb1-48cf-8792-ae4773e9a79b/content
FAO. (2025). Innovaciones en la ganadería para la sostenibilidad multidimensional. FAO. Asunción. https://www.fao.org/paraguay/noticias/detail-events/en/c/1742280/
Frigeri, K. D. M., Kachinski, K. D., Ghisi, N. d. C., Deniz, M., Damasceno, F. A., Barbari, M., Herbut, P., & Corrêa Vieira, F. M. C. (2023). Effects of heat stress in dairy cows raised in the confined system: A scientometric review. Animals, 13(3), 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030350
Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., … Godfray, H. C. J. (2013). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science, 341(6141), 33–34. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485
Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A. & Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities . Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://www.fao.org/3/i3437e/i3437e.pdf
González, M. N., Martínez, I., & Wyszynski, D. (2016). Traceability. Conferencias abiertas. Uruguay: Comité Internacional para el Registro de Prácticas de Animales (ICAR), MGAP https://www.icar.org/Documents/Puerto%20Varas%202016%20Abstracts/
Guerra, G. L.; Yurika Mizubuti, I.; de Azambuja Ribeiro, E. L.; Prado-Calixto, O. P.; das Dores Ferreira da Silva, L., ...Éderson Luis, H. (2016). Supplementation of beef cattle grazing Brachiaria brizantha: Performance and carcass ultrasound prediction. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 37(5), 3277–3292. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4457/445748363036.pdf
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). (2024). Produção da pecuária municipal 2023. Vol. 51. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. https://www.gov.br/mpa/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ppm_2023_v51_br_informativo.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Carnes (INAC). (2024a). A journey through the Uruguayan beef chain: Annual report 2024. INAC. https://www.inac.uy/innovaportal/file/27005/1/annual-report-2024.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Carnes (INAC). (2024b). Uruguay beef Compliance with EUDR. Montevideo: Instituto Nacional de Carnes (INAC), Editorial Desing SALVO comunicación. https://www.inac.uy/innovaportal/file/27008/1/uruguay-beef---eudr.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). (2025, abril 30). Suplementación líquida en vacas gestantes: Una estrategia que potencia la producción de carne de calidad. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis, INTA. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/suplementacion-liquida-en-vacas-gestantes-una-estrategia-que-potencia-la-produccion-de
Issa, A. A., Majed, S., Ameer, A., & Al-Jawahry, H. M. (2024). IoT and AI in livestock management: A game changer for farmers. E3S Web of Conferences, 491, 02015. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2024/21/e3sconf_icecs2024_02015.pdf
Kaimowitz, D., & Angelsen, A. (2008). Will livestock intensification help save Latin America’s tropical forests? Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 27(1-2), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549810802225168
Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP). (2017). SNIG—Sistema de trazabilidad bovina de Uruguay. MGAP. https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/tramites-y-servicios/servicios/sistema-nacional-informacion-ganadera
Morais, H. B., Loyola Chardulo, L. A. L., Baldassini, W. A., Castro Lippi, I. C. d., Orsi, G. B., & Ruviaro, C. F. (2023). Environmental impacts of high-quality Brazilian beef production: A comparative life cycle assessment of premium and super-premium beef. Animals, 13(22), 3578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13223578
Mottet, A., de Haan, C., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., Opio, C., & Gerber, P. (2017). Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Global Food Security, 14, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001
OECD. (2009). The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056886-en
OPSAA–IICA. (2024). Monitoreo y evaluación de políticas agrícolas 2024: Innovación para el crecimiento sostenible de la productividad. https://opsaa.iica.int/es/resource-1871-monitoreo-y-evaluacion-de-politicas-agricolas-2024:-innovacion-para-el-crecimiento-sostenible-de-la-productividad
Papakonstantinou, G. I., Voulgarakis N., Terzidou G., Fotos L., Giamouri E., & Papatsiros V. G. (2024). Precision Livestock Farming Technology: Applications and Challenges of Animal Welfare and Climate Change. Agriculture, 14(4), 620. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/4/620
Parra-Cortés, R. I., Magaña-Magaña, M. A., & Piñeiro-Vázquez, A. T. (2019). Intensificación sostenible de la ganadería bovina tropical basada en recursos locales: alternativa de mitigación ambiental para América Latina. ITEA-Información Técnica Económica Agraria, 115(4), 342-359. https://www.aida-itea.org/aida-itea/files/itea/revistas/2019/115-4/(342-359)%20ITEA%20115-4.pdf
Pereira, M. D. A., Bungenstab, D. J., Euclides, V. P., Malafaia, G. C., Biscola, P. H., Menezes, G. R., Abreu, U. G. P. de ... & de Souza, V. F. (2024). From traditionally extensive to sustainably intensive: a review on the path to a sustainable and inclusive beef farming in Brazil. Animals, 14(16), 2340. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/16/2340
Pesenti Rossi, G., Dalla Costa, E., Barbieri, S., Minero, M., & Canali, E. (2024). A systematic review on the application of precision livestock farming technologies to detect lying, rest and sleep behavior in dairy calves. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 11, 1477731. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1477731/full
Pinedo, P. J., & De Vries, A. (2017). Season of conception is associated with future survival, fertility, and milk yield of Holstein cows. Journal of dairy science, 100(8), 6631-6639. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030217305775
Pomar, C., & Remus, A. (2023). Fundamentals, limitations and pitfalls on the development and application of precision nutrition techniques for precision livestock farming. Animal, 17 (2), 100763. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731123000599
Reinosso Ortíz, V., y Soto Silva, C. (2006). Cálculo y manejo en pastoreo controlado: II) Pastoreo rotativo y en franjas. Veterinaria (Montevideo), 41(161–162), 15–24. https://revistasmvu.com.uy/index.php/smvu/article/download/360/229/591
Rius, A. (2015). Mandatory livestock traceability as a catalyst for knowledge-intensive services in Uruguay. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0000005
Sales, M. F. L., Paulino, M. F., Valadares Filho, S. C., Figueiredo, D. M., Porto, M. O., & Detmann, E. (2011). Níveis de suplementação para recria de bovinos de corte em pastejo durante o período de transição seca-águas. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40(4), 904-911. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbz/a/SVhvvPPJyPgCwPmTpWF53bG/abstract/?lang=pt&format=html
Schillings, J., Bennett, R., & Rose, D. C. (2021). Exploring the Potential of Precision Livestock Farming Technologies to Help Address Farm Animal Welfare. Frontiers in Animal Science, 2, 639678. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2021.639678
SENACSA. (2025). Estadísticas de exportación de carne bovina—Datos abiertos. SENACSA. https://senacsa.gov.py/servicios/servicios-tecnicos/estadisticas/estadisticas-con-datos-abiertos/exportacion/
Thornton, P., Nelson, G., Mayberry, D., & Herrero, M. (2022). Impacts of heat stress on global cattle production during the 21st century: a modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(3), e192-e201. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(22)00002-X/fulltext
Kenneth, J. (2024). Livestock and products annual—Uruguay (UY2024 0003). United States Departament of Agriculture/ Foreing Agricultural Service. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Livestock+and+Products+Annual_Buenos+Aires_Uruguay_UY2024-0003.pdf
Uruguay XXI. (2024). Annual report foreign trade 2024. Uruguay XXI. https://www.uruguayxxi.gub.uy/uploads/informacion/527e509a7d6b384ad50a0de602183dd9707ac4d2.pdf
Werkheiser, I. (2020). Technology and responsibility: a discussion of underexamined risks and concerns in precision livestock farming. Animal Frontiers, 10(1), 51-57. https://academic.oup.com/af/article/10/1/51/5699801
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Xavier, I. M., Pereira, D. H., Pina, D. dos S., Pedreira, B. C., Bolson, D. C.,... & Fisher, A. (editor) (2023). Feeding behaviour of beef cattle in intensive finishing on pasture and supplemented with different additives. Animal Production Science, 63(17), 1782–1790. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22257
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Juan Daniel Avalos Añazco, Jorge Raúl Mora Del Puerto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All content in this journal is under Creative Commons Attribution License.
All content in this journal is under