Diseño de un instrumento económico para la gestión de fauna silvestre: el caso del Valor al Estado Natural de los recursos de fauna silvestre

Alfredo Apaza Ticona; Edgar Alexs  Arana Olivos

doi:10.18004/investig.agrar.2022.junio.2401699

Authors

Alfredo Apaza Ticona Servicio Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre. Lima, Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-3472
Edgar Alexs Arana Olivos Servicio Nacional Forestal y de Fauna Silvestre. Lima, Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1248-5194

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18004/investig.agrar.2022.junio.2401699

Keywords:

bioeconomic models, Value to the Natural State, right of use

Abstract

According to the regulations of the forestry and wildlife sector, in order to take advantage of wildlife resources, an economic compensation must be paid in favor of the State. In this context, the National Forestry and Wildlife Service of Peru developed a methodology to estimate the payment for the right to use wildlife. In this way, a model was prepared to determine the Value of the Natural State of the resources of the wild fauna - VEN, with which the "approximate economic value" of the wild fauna in its habitat is estimated and that serves as a basis for the calculation payment for the right of use. The methodology is based on bioeconomic concepts that allowed defining the economic and biological variables included in the model. The development of the model allows having an economic instrument for the management of wildlife resources in the country. It is important to note that the developed model does not include all the ecosystem values or services linked to wildlife. On the other hand, the development of the model shows the need to carry out new investigations that allow to demonstrate in its real magnitude the importance of wildlife in the ecosystem and allow the development of adequate management policies based on economic theory

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aanes, S., Engen, S., Sæther, B-E., Willebrand, T. & Marcström, V. (2002). Sustainable Harvesting Strategies of Willow Ptarmigan in a Fluctuating Environment. Ecological Applications, 12(1), 281-290. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3061152

Allain, S., Ruault, J-F., Moraine, M. & Madelrieux, S. (2022). The ‘bioeconomics vs bioeconomy’ debate: Beyond criticism, advancing research fronts. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 58-73. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422421001106

Beckerman, S. (1983). Carpe diem: An optimal foraging approach to Bari fishing and hunting.En E. Hames & W. Vickers. Adaptive responses of native Amazonians. Elsevier.

Booth, V. R. (2009). A comparison of the prices of hunting tourism in southern and eastern Africa. Budapest: International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation, CIC, FAO, 39 p.

Boscolo, M., Dijk, K. & Savenije, H. (2010). Financing Sustainable Small-Scale Forestry: Lessons from Developing National Forest Financing Strategies in Latin America. Forests, 1(4).

Caro, J., Delibes-Mateos, M., Viñuela, J., López-Lucero, J. F. & Arroyo, B. (2015). Improving decision-making for sustainable hunting: regulatory mechanisms of hunting pressure in red-legged partridge. Sustainability Science, 10(3), 479-489. doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0302-z

Clark, C. W. (2007). The Worldwide Crisis in Fisheries: Economic Models and Human Behavior. Cambridge, University Press. Disponible en https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/worldwide-crisis-in-fisheries/0726A744452A8E61CEE20A090F5CE9B7

Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady-state economics: with new essays. Island press.

Damania, R., Milner-Gulland, E. J. & Crookes, D. J. (2005). A bioeconomic analysis of bushmeat hunting. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1560), 259-266. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2945

Hammack, J. & Brown, G. M. (1974). Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bio-economic Analysis: Resources for the Future. Disponible en https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=qcQYAQAAIAAJ

Hammack, J. & Brown, G.M. (2016). Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis: Taylor & Francis. Disponible en https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=bq3OCwAAQBAJ

Hicks, R., Sanchirico, J., Holland, D. & Curtis, R. (2004). An Introduction to Spatial Modeling in Fisheries Economics. Marine Resource Economics, 19.

Hill, K., Kaplan, H., Hawkes, K. & Hurtado, A.M. (1987). Foraging decisions among Aché hunter-gatherers: New data and implications for optimal foraging models. Ethology and Sociobiology 8(1), 1-36. Disponible en https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309587900550

Jana, A. & Kumar Roy, S. (2022). Holling-Tanner prey-predator model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response including delay. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 42(1), 86-100. doi: 10.1080/02286203.2020.1839168

Keith, J. E. & Lyon, K.S. (1985). Valuing wildlife management: a Utah deer herd. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 216-222.

Lande, R., Sæther, B-E & Engen, S. (1997). Threshold harvesting for sustainability of fluctuating resources. Ecology, 78(5), 1341-1350.

Lavín, F., Urrutia, A. & Orrego, S. (2007). Valoración económica del medio ambiente: fundamentos económicos, econométricos y aplicaciones: Thomson.

Lee, D-J., Sirgy, M. J., Larsen, V. & Wright, N. D. (2002). Developing a Subjective Measure of Consumer Well-Being. Journal of Macromarketing, 22(2),158-169. doi: 10.1177/0276146702238219

Lindsey, P. A., Balme, G. A., Booth, V. R. & Midlane, N. (2012). The Significance of African Lions for the Financial Viability of Trophy Hunting and the Maintenance of Wild Land. PLOS ONE 7(1), e29332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029332

Ling, S. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2008). When does spatial structure matter in models of wildlife harvesting? Journal of Applied Ecology,45(1), 63-71. Disponible en: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01391.x

López-Feldman, A. & Wilen, J. E. (2008). Poverty and spatial dimensions of non-timber forest extraction. Environment and Development Economics, 13(5), 621-642. Disponible en https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/poverty-and-spatial-dimensions-of-nontimber-forest-extraction/A2A093538893FF69D5CE80F55E08B5E4

Lotka, A. J. & Dover Publications, I. (1956). Elements of Mathematical Biology. Dover Publications. Disponible en: https://books.google.com.pe/books?id=1tzaAAAAMAAJ

Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2008). New Perspectives on Harvesting as One Driver of Ecosystem Dynamics. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(1), 1-3. Disponible en http://www.jstor.org/stable/20143945

Mizaras, S. (1998). The methods of calculating stumpage prices and analysing Lithuanian forestry.Baltic Forestry, 4(1),56-60.

Morton, O., Scheffers, B. R., Haugaasen, T. & Edwards, D. P. (2022). Mixed protection of threatened species traded under CITES. Current Biology, 32(5), 999-1009.e9. Disponible en https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982222000227

Mougenot, B. & Doussoulin, J-P. (2022). Conceptual evolution of the bioeconomy: a bibliometric analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(1), 1031-1047. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01481-2

Nautiyal, J., Kant, S. & Williams, J. (1995). A mechanism for tracking the value of standing timber in an imperfect market. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere, 25, 638-648.

Salo, M., Sirén, A. & Kalliola, R. (2013). Chapter 20 - Diagnosing Wild Species Harvest: The DWiSH Procedure. In M. Salo, A. Sirén & R. Kalliola. Eds. Diagnosing Wild Species Harvest. San Diego: Academic Press. Disponible en https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123972040000206

Siren, A., Cardenas, J., Hambäck, P. & Parvinen, K. (2013). Distance Friction and the Cost of Hunting in Tropical Forest. Land Economics, 89, 558-574.

Skonhoft, A. & Armstrong, C. (2004). Conservation of Wildlife : A bio-economic model of a wildlife reserve under the pressure of habitat destruction and harvesting outside the reserve: Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Working Paper Series 18.

Smith, M. D., Sanchirico, J. N. & Wilen, J. E. (2009). The economics of spatial-dynamic processes: Applications to renewable resources. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57(1), 104-121. Disponible en https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009506960800082X

Sutherland, W. J. (2001). Sustainable exploitation: a review of principles and methods. Wildlife Biology 7(3), 131-140. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.2001.017

Weinbaum, K. Z., Brashares, J. S., Golden, C. D. & Getz, W. M. (2013). Searching for sustainability: are assessments of wildlife harvests behind the times? Ecology letters,16 (1), 99-111.Wilson, D. S. (1998). Hunting, Sharing, and Multilevel Selection: The Tolerated‐Theft Model Revisited. Current Anthropology, 39(1),73-97. doi:10.1086/204699